News

Christmas Rice

1 cup uncooked rice

2 cans chicken and rice soup

1 ¾ cups water

1 teaspoon salt

1 stick butter or margarine

1 large onion (chopped)

1 large green bell pepper (chopped)

1 small jar chopped pimentos (drained)

1 can or jar button or sliced mushrooms (drained)

Put all ingredients in large casserole dish.  Bake at 350 degrees for 1 hour.  Stir three times while baking.

 

Comments Off on Christmas Rice

Department of Labor Issues Long-Awaited Rules

The Labor Department issued 750 pages of final revised regulations for the Family and Medical Leave Act on Nov. 14, marking the first major regulatory update of the 1993 law in more than 13 years.

The new rules will take effect 60 days after publication in the Nov. 17 Federal Register (73 Fed. Reg. 67,934). In addition to addressing certain interpretive issues that have arisen over the years, the regulations implement statutory amendments signed into law by President Bush in January allowing family members of wounded military personnel to take up to six months of unpaid leave to care for them during their rehabilitation process.

Assistant Secretary of Labor Victoria A. Lipnic told BNA Nov. 13 that the final rules “will improve communications between employees, employers, and health care providers to make the law operate more smoothly, and provide needed clarity for both workers and employers about their responsibilities and rights” under the FMLA.

Lipnic said the final rules have been in the works since shortly after her nomination in March 2002. She said the process involved numerous meetings seeking input from employer and employee “stakeholders” and included the unusual step of making a request for information from the public before issuing proposed regulations this past February and seeking public comments on them. Lipnic said she personally reviewed about 20,000 comments during the process.

FMLA Amendment Added Military Family Leave

The Defense Department authorization bill for fiscal year 2008 included provisions amending the FMLA to provide two new leave entitlements—military caregiver leave and qualifying exigency leave.

Eligible employees who are family members of covered service members will be able to take up to six months (26 workweeks) of leave in a single 12-month period to care for a servicemember with a serious illness or injury that was incurred in the line of duty during active duty. The 12-month period begins when the employee starts using military caregiver leave. Employers will not have the option of using the calendar-year method as they do for other types of FMLA leave, Lipnic said. She explained that entitlement to 26 weeks of military caregiver leave is provided for each service member and for each illness or injury incurred and covers more extended family members than are covered by FMLA leave for other reasons.

Qualifying exigency leave is intended to help families manage the affairs of National Guard and Reserves members while they are on active duty or called to active duty status in support of a contingency operation. Family members may use all or part of the regular allotment of 12 weeks of FMLA leave. The final rules define “any qualifying exigency” to include a number of broad categories of reasons and activities, including short-notice deployment, military events and related activities, child care and school activities, financial and legal arrangements, counseling, rest and recuperation, post-deployment activities, and any additional activities agreed to by the employer and the employee.

The regulations also address the definition of a “serious health condition.” One of the six definitions of a serious health condition is three consecutive days of incapacity plus two visits to a health care provider. The final rules state that the two visits must occur within 30 days of the start of the period of incapacity and that the first visit must occur within seven days of the start of incapacity.

The employee must obtain a medical certification regarding a serious health condition. The final rules allow the employer to contact the employee’s health care provider to obtain information required by the certification form, but specify that the employer’s representative doing the contacting must be a health care provider, a human resources professional, a leave administrator, or a management official. Because of privacy concerns, the rules forbid the direct supervisor of the employee from contacting the employee’s health care provider.

If the employer views a medical certification form as incomplete or insufficient, the new regulations require the company to notify the employee in writing, specify what information is lacking, and give the employee seven calendar days to provide the additional information.

The final rules codify a 2005 opinion letter from DOL’s Wage and Hour Division stating that employers may require employees to provide a new medical certification every 12-month FMLA period for medical conditions that last longer than one year (56 BTM 340, 10/25/05). But the new rules also allow an employer to request recertification of an ongoing condition every six months in conjunction with an absence.

Employer Notice Requirements according to a copy of the final regulations obtained by BNA, the new rules consolidate in one section all the particular types of notice employers must provide their employees, as well as reconciling certain conflicts and time limits in the provisions.
The regulations require employers to provide employees with a general notice about the FMLA, an eligibility notice, a notice of rights and responsibilities, and a designation notice. The time period for the employer to provide various notices has been extended from two to five business days.

Under the previous regulations, employees had up to two business days after an absence to notify the employer of the need for FMLA leave. However, the new rules require employees to comply with an employer’s usual procedures for reporting an absence, unless unusual circumstances prevent this.

The FMLA allows employees to use accrued paid leave as a substitute for unpaid FMLA leave, and it allows employers to require employees to exhaust paid leave before taking unpaid leave. The old regulations treated the use of vacation or personal leave differently than sick leave, but the new rules treat all forms of paid leave the same. However, an employee seeking to substitute paid leave must comply with the employer’s uniform policy for use of such leave, such as providing a minimum amount of advance notice, unless the employer chooses to waive procedural requirements.

In response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2002 decision in Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide Inc. (535 U.S. 81, 7 WH Cases 2d 1153 (2002)) and other court decisions invalidating categorical penalty provisions in the old FMLA regulations, the new rules remove those provisions and instead state that the employer may be liable when its failure to follow the notification rules causes individualized harm to the employee.

The final regulations codify DOL’s longstanding position that employees may settle or release FMLA claims without obtaining court or agency approval, in contrast to a recent federal appeals court decision, but that prospective waivers of FMLA rights are prohibited, according to DOL.

In contrast with some court decisions, the rules provide that time spent working a light-duty assignment does not count toward an employee’s FMLA leave allotment and that the employee’s right to job restoration is held in abeyance while the employee is performing light duty or until the end of the applicable 12-month period.

Under current rules, employers are permitted to apply uniform policies requiring employees who take medical leave to submit a fitness-for-duty certification in order to return to work. The new regulations also will permit employers to require that the certification specifically address the employee’s ability to perform the essential functions of the specific job. If reasonable job safety concerns exist, according to the regulations, the employer may require a fitness-for-duty certification before an employee returns to work after taking intermittent leave.
By Susan J. McGolrick

The final rules can be accessed at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-26577.htm.

— Life, Heal

Comments Off on Department of Labor Issues Long-Awaited Rules

Small Firms Shiver as Health Premiums Rise

  • Already struggling in a tough economy, many small employers are about to face another big hit: markedly higher increases in health-insurance premiums as they head into 2009.
[Chart]

For many of these companies, the steeper increases couldn’t come at a worse time, when the economy is weakening and credit is harder to come by.

“We can’t pass these costs on to our customers; the market just won’t bear it,” said Daniel Lance, who owns E.CAB, a St. Petersburg, Fla., firm that produces finishes and fixtures for elevator-cab interiors.

After no increase last year, E.CAB’s premiums jumped 75% to about $6,800 a month when its annual Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida policy came up for renewal this month. Much of the jump was triggered by the hiring of a few older workers by the 25-employee firm, pushing it into a higher-cost actuarial bracket. E.CAB couldn’t get a better price from rival insurers.

Rather than pass the cost on to his employees, who aren’t required to contribute premiums for themselves though they do for family members, Mr. Lance said he’s forgoing new wood-cutting equipment he had planned to purchase. “I just felt it was a bad time [to pass on costs],” he said. “The employees are having a tough enough time, too.”

As hard as it has been for businesses to absorb ever-higher health-care costs each year, the collective premiums they paid had actually climbed at a slower rate in recent years. But as small businesses begin to receive their annual renewal notices, employers and health-insurance brokers in the South, Midwest and California report noticeably steeper rises. Some premium increases being quoted to employers are double those quoted just a few months ago.

In a nationwide survey of 30 insurance brokers released by Citigroup last week, more said insurers were raising premiums at a faster rate than those who reported slowing increases.

The clearest evidence of acceleration comes directly from insurers themselves. As they released third-quarter earnings in recent weeks, WellPoint Inc., UnitedHealth Inc. and Humana Inc. all reported less aggressive pricing by competitors in a number of markets, making it easier to charge premiums that would assure a solid profit.

“Generally speaking, we’ve been increasing our pricing over the last several months and last several quarters with the thought in mind that it’s going to be a lot more conservative in terms of the pricing environment and we’re beginning to see that,” said James Murray, Humana’s chief operating officer, in its earnings conference call with analysts late last month.

For-profit health insurers have seen profit margins shrink this year in the face of higher-than-expected medical costs and pricing missteps, not to mention membership declines as more businesses drop or cut back coverage. While companies with 500 or more employees might have leverage to negotiate, health insurers are “being much more rigid” with smaller firms, said Edward Kaplan, national practice leader at Segal Co., an employee benefits consultancy.

Adding to upward pressure on prices could be dozens of not-for-profit Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans, whose investment portfolios have taken a beating in the recent market turmoil. In recent years, the not-for-profits have been under political pressure in their states to reduce their big surpluses from flush years by providing price breaks to customers. Analysts say they now may have more cause not to.

“Now that investment income is significantly less, we could see less concern about an embarrassment of riches and more about battening down the hatches,” said Matthew Borsch, a Goldman Sachs analyst.

C. Steven Tucker, a health insurance broker for small businesses in Illinois, said his clients have been getting increases ranging between 28% and 31% this month, compared to typical increases of 18% to 20%. In Florida, brokers say many plans hit with high increases are high-deductible plans eligible to be used with a health savings account.

A few years ago, health insurers tried to win business with the new health savings accounts by charging low premiums, but since the most popular ones pay 100% of costs after a $1,500 to $3,000 deductible, their costs have been higher than anticipated. “Now the insurers are catching up,” said John Sinibaldi, an employee-benefits consultant in Seminole, Fla.

Dottie Jessup, who owns bicycle shops in Clearwater and Palm Harbor, Fla., with her husband, Tom, said they and their 25 employees, who share premium costs 50-50, couldn’t handle a 12.5% increase set to go into effect next month. “We don’t know what kind of year we’re going into,” she said.

Instead, they went with their only other option: to raise one plan’s deductible to $2,500 from $2,000 and the other to $3,500 from $2,850, in exchange for just a slight premium increase.

“Our concern is that we’re getting to the point where we’re wondering where this is all heading, because you can only reduce benefits and contain costs so much,” she said. “What’s our ability to provide benefits to our staff going to look like in the future?”

G. Leo DuMouchel, an Atlanta-area employee-benefits consultant, said that after years of negotiating smaller increases by raising deductibles and paring benefits, many of his small-business customers have run out of that option.

“They’ve pushed [cost-sharing] to the limit,” said Mr. DuMouchel, who added he hasn’t seen a premium increase for his clients below 17% since October, compared to 6% to 8% increases last summer. “They know employees can’t handle any more.”

Write to Vanessa Fuhrmans at vanessa.fuhrmans@wsj.com

Source:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122688298424632195.html?mod=googlenews_wsj#printMode

Comments Off on Small Firms Shiver as Health Premiums Rise

FRESH APPLE POUND CAKE (A FALL FAVORITE)

Mix well:

2 cups sugar
1 ½ cup liquid Crisco
3 eggs
1 teaspoon vanilla

Add, beating well:

3 cups all purpose flour (sifted)
1 teaspoon salt
1 teaspoon soda

Stir in: 3 cups diced apples
1 cup chopped pecans or walnuts
1 cup coconut (optional)

Bake in a greased and floured tube pan for 1 hour and 20 minutes at 350 degrees.

May be glazed with:

1 cup light brown sugar
1 teaspoon vanilla
¼ cup cream or evaporated milk
1 stick butter or margarine

Cook 2 ½ minutes, stirring constantly, and pour over cake while both are warm.

Comments Off on FRESH APPLE POUND CAKE (A FALL FAVORITE)